Compassionate Conservativism should NOT mean you lose your property without recourse or a single right. How did core members of the GA Republican Party and Cobb County elected officials take the constitutional and property rights of a family, whose head of household is a USMC Veteran and Airline Captain, all because he stated, you can't sell a deeded interest without permission. Enter the former head of the GA Republican Party with stated ties to the White House.
(PRWEB) September 3, 2004 -- In direct opposition to property, contract, and constitutional law, as well as current case precedence, the GA Court of Appeals has just ruled that a deed/property with no covenants and restrictions, may apply such limitations after purchase to a property with none prior. And if that is not shocking enough, a non existent, dissolved, or entity with no standing can file such a claim and prevail. It just became law, which we have filed a Motion For Reconsideration, as a result of.
How could this happen. When owner objected to the sale of our common area for pennies on the dollar to a foreign diplomat, a file was created on us. Judge Grubbs additionally assessed legal fees with a bond required, totaling approximately $50,000, to a private family for having erected an approved fence to keep our property from being damaged, or family members from being videotaped, resulting from speaking out about a travesty, perpetrated by a GA State Senators law firm and former Chairman of the GA Republican Party, (Brock, Clay, Calhoun, Wilson & Rogers).
The gravity of this unanimous precedent authored by the GA Court of Appeals, is a private homeowner, with no covenants, restrictions, or founded homeowners association acting in accordance with their charter, can now have attached by restrictions to their property simply by filing documents, without owners knowledge, concurrence, or agreement.
If the entity does not exist or has been dissolved, dont worry in GA unless you are a property owner that is! Evidence has little to no bearing on the outcome, not in Cobb County Superior Court anyway. And when the Judge at the Superior Court level authors her decision, dont assume that verdict or even the Plaintiff will remain the same. Ready for Justice on the Fly...
Cobb Superior Court Case # 00-1-2603-22, later changed to 02-1-04560-42)
Plaintiff: LMHA & the ACC of LMTHA.
In the case of LMHA, Inc., the prevailing party was a dissolved corporate entity with NO standing or interest. Plaintiffs claim a 1996 Amendment, which clearly states LMHA, Inc. no longer exists, but is superseded by LMTA, Inc., gives LMHA, Inc. the right to enforce LMTA Covenants. You couldnt make this stuff up! But Ronald Cannon, the person claiming different titles, filing lawsuits, and whose name appears on conflicting documents submitted to the court, swore to the Superior Court, he had only operated as El Persidente of LMHA, Inc. always. Unfortunately Cannon, who filed and renewed these lawsuits, sold the common area owned by Phase II & III owners, via a signature on a quit claim deed, which he identifies his position as LMTA President". Judge Grubbs understood the issue she said, as she was not a lay person!
LMTHA, the second Plaintiff, was created by the Defendants. But Judge Grubbs decided, the Rices could not be the owners or recognized officers of this LMTHA. She hand picked her own, and threatened the owners of the corporation with contempt, if they used their own company name. How did she do that?
GA Court of Appeals Court Case # A04A1244
Original Plaintiff in the underlying case: LMHA & the ACC of LMTHA
Reply Brief filed by: LMHA, Inc. Phase I & ACC of LMTA, Phase II & III
Appeals Court Prevailing Plaintiff: LMHA, Inc. & ACC of LMHA
Our Appeal brief included 7 of 13 enumerations of error, due to page limitations. The document was appealed from the lower court verdict, to the same Plaintiffs (LMHA & ACC of LMTHA), of course. However, the Reply Brief came from a different Plaintiff or Appellee (LMHA Phase I & LMTA Phase II & III). We filed a Motion to Strike and Disregard, as instructed by the Appellate Court Clerk. However instead of receiving a quick reply on the Motion, we were forced to call numerous times and ask what the status was. Next, we were told by Clerk Bill Martin, that our submission had been incorrectly coded by his office, and he would look into it. Approximately 4 months after submission, the Courts ruling was issued, overturning all current case precedence and ALL prevailing property, contract, and constitutional law! The Appeals Court Judges, in a unanimous verdict, overturned all case precedence, they themselves had authored. Moreover, their Appellate Court ruling, yielded a new Plaintiff on Appeal: LMHA, Inc. & the ACC of LMHA! This new Plaintiff was not the prevailing party in Superior Court, nor the Appellee who filed a Reply Brief in the Appellate Court. Scotty beam me up and lock in Phasers!
This is a small slice of the power brokering, Republican based effort to control property, the courts, and the application of law. No property owner, Georgian, or American is safe! We must protect the rights of Georgians and Americans. But will you make sure the voice of freedom can be heard? Feel free to contact us for details. The evidence and effort is larger than anything you have ever heard, with the exception of Watergate! Visit www.ricegang.com or call 770-605-5921.
# # #
|
