October 15, 2008
Home
About
Submit Press Release
PR Firms
Editors/Journalists
Search Archives
 
News Releases by Category  
News by Country  
News by MSA  
All News for Today  
Browse News by Day  
News by Trackbacks  
All Press Releases for April 2, 2006 Subscribe to this News Feed  
 

FDA Fails To Regulate Natural Treatments For Psychiatric Conditions

Hundreds of “natural” treatments are marketed for psychiatric conditions but are essentially unregulated by the FDA, according to the April issue of The Carlat Psychiatry Report.

Newburyport, MA (PRWEB) April 2, 2006 -- According to a review conducted by The Carlat Psychiatry Report, hundreds of natural treatments are currently marketed for psychiatric disorders in the United States, an industry that is largely unregulated by the FDA.

While the FDA strictly regulates conventional psychiatric pharmaceuticals, such as Prozac and Ritalin, “natural” treatments (compounds that are not created in a laboratory) fall under the special category of “dietary supplements.” In 1994, Congress passed a little-known law called DSHEA that drastically scaled back the FDA’s authority over dietary supplements.

The result has been that hundreds of products have been introduced over the last decade for treating psychiatric problems without undergoing the review process required of standard medications.

An example cited by the newsletter is a product called “Brain Focus,” produced by Z-labs and marketed on their Web site (http://zlabs.us/brainfocus.html). Brain Focus is a blend of 17 vitamins and herbals, none of which have been proven to be effective for any psychiatric disorder in large placebo-controlled studies. Nonetheless, it is advertised as “clinically tested to improve memory and focus.” Such a claim is legal because it does not mention a specific psychiatric disease.

According to current government regulations, as long as a label doesn’t say that a supplement actually cures a specific disease, positive health claims are allowed under a category known as “Nutritional Support Statements.”

According to The Carlat Psychiatry Report: “If asked to, manufacturers are required to produce some sort of ‘substantiation’ for their claims. However, unlike the FDA approval process, evidence need not be based on placebo-controlled double-blind trials; case series, small open trials or even suggestive animal trials are sufficient.”

The Report concludes by recommending that psychiatrists and patients scrutinize the claims on supplement labels: “We recommend that psychiatrists ask their patients whether they are taking dietary supplements and find out what is in them. Many patients will be surprised to learn that the health claims on the labels often are based on tiny unreplicated studies. They may then decide that there are better ways to spend their hard-earned money.”

The Carlat Psychiatry Report, an influential monthly newsletter widely read by U.S. psychiatrists, is edited by Daniel Carlat, M.D., an assistant clinical professor of psychiatry at Tufts University School of Medicine in Boston, MA.

The full text of the article can be found at www.TheCarlatReport.com.

###


See the original story at: http://www.prweb.com/releases/2006/04/prweb366478.htm
Email this story to a colleague
Printer Friendly Version
Bookmark with del.icio.us
Bookmark with Y!MyWeb
Submit to Digg
Daniel Carlat
CLEARVIEW PUBLISHING
978-499-0583
Email us Here

There are no multimedia files attached to this release. If this is your release you may add images or other multimedia files through your login.

If you have any questions regarding information in these press releases please contact the company listed in the press release. Please do not contact PRWeb. We will be unable to assist you with your inquiry. PRWeb disclaims any content contained in these release. Our complete disclaimer appears here.
 
Disclaimer: If you have any questions regarding information in these press releases please contact the company listed in the press release.
Please do not contact PRWeb®. We will be unable to assist you with your inquiry.
PRWeb® disclaims any content contained in these releases. Our complete disclaimer appears here.

© Copyright 1997-2007, Vocus PRW Holdings, LLC.
Vocus, PRWeb and Publicity Wire are trademarks or registered trademarks of Vocus, Inc. or Vocus PRW Holdings, LLC.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Copyright